Sizewell C Nuclear Licence Challenge Rejected by High Court

A campaign organization’s High Court attempt to contest a regulatory body’s decision to grant a licence for the Sizewell C nuclear facility in Suffolk has been unsuccessful. Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell Limited (TEAGS) asserted that the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) illegally neglected to incorporate sea defences into its assessments when granting a nuclear site licence for the project. During a hearing on Tuesday, legal representatives for TEAGS argued that the judicial review concerning the decision ought to proceed, whereas opposing counsel contended it should be dismissed. Mrs Justice Lieven, in her judgment, rejected the claim, determining that the challenge possessed “no chance of success” and was “totally without merit”. The project received its nuclear site licence in May, with the ONR stating that “outstanding matters” had been addressed. Philip Coppel KC, representing TEAGS, stated in written filings that the objection to the issuance of the nuclear licence was “arguable” because the licence does not encompass scenarios involving an accident or other emergencies related to sea defences. He asserted in court: “Sea defences have the obvious potential to affect safety.” Rose Grogan, representing the ONR, indicated in written submissions that evidence found “in a number of detailed technical assessment reports” suggested that concerns regarding the sea defences “can be addressed post-licensing”. She further contended that the challenge was “bound to fail” and ought to be dismissed. EDF, the French energy firm, intends to construct a two-reactor nuclear power station at the location, projected to produce 3.2 gigawatts of energy and supply power to approximately six million residences. The Labour government initiated a £5.5bn subsidy program for Sizewell C in August. A representative from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero stated that these funds would “provide certainty and ensure the project has access to the necessary financial support to remain on track”. The final investment decision for this project is anticipated in 2025. TEAGS, known for its campaign as Stop Sizewell C, expressed disappointment regarding the outcome. Alison Downes, a member of the group, commented: “It remains the case that we are deeply concerned about this issue. “There is still no final design of the sea defences let alone guarantees that the construction is feasible. “We thank our legal team and supporters and are considering our position.”