The autumn budget presented by the chancellor has drawn strong criticism from the head of Hampshire County Council. Conservative councillor Nick Adams-King stated that Labour’s initial budget since 2010 is “deeply disappointing” for local growth. Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered the budget on Wednesday, which is projected to increase taxes by £40bn, and asserted that it would “fix the foundations” of Britain. In his reaction, Mr Adams-King indicated that the authority would need to “grapple” with additional expenses following the announcement. He commented that the £1.3bn allocated to local government seemed like “a few grains of sand when distrubuted across England.” In a statement, the council leader asserted: “The huge increase in employer National Insurance contributions will cost the council millions, and while government say it is funded, that is part of the extra local government funding so is in effect an extra burden. “The effect of the national living wage rising way above inflation will also likely increase our costs substantially. We simply cannot afford this.” During the budget’s presentation, Rishi Sunak, the leader of the opposition, countered by remarking that the budget featured “broken promise after broken promise.” Mr Adams-King noted that, prior to the budget, the Local Government Association had reported that local authorities were confronting a £2.3bn deficit in the 2025/26 fiscal year. He further stated: “What the chancellor has done is offer a totally inadequate sum, even if we have received our fair share of it.” He added: “Then, almost immediately, she has hit us with the increased operating costs. Our budget deficit will remain unless we are given the tools to decide how to spend and raise our money.” He asserted that they “should not be forced to operate via government diktat” and that the budget contained nothing to assist their improvement, despite his communication with the chancellor detailing how councils could achieve this through powers to innovate and reform. The government also committed £500m for the upkeep of local roads and £232m to support councils in homelessness prevention efforts. However, Mr Adams-King remarked that the “only” positive aspect was the additional funding for schools and children’s social care, though he characterized it as a “relatively” modest amount that they “simply cannot rely on.” He further stated: “The extra money for special education needs and disabilities (SEND), which is a huge issue for Hampshire, is a drop in the ocean compared to the pressure we face.” He concluded by saying: “I just don’t see how this government is investing for growth in Hampshire.” For updates, BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight can be followed on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), or Instagram. Copyright 2024 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC bears no responsibility for the content of external websites. Information regarding our external linking policy is available. Post navigation Lincolnshire Communities to Gain Enhanced Authority Over 20mph Zones Derbyshire Councillors to Consider Permanent Traveller Site Locations