Ferrari competitor Charles Leclerc, who currently holds the third position in this year’s drivers’ championship, incurred a penalty for using expletives during a press conference following the Mexico City Grand Prix held last weekend. The 27-year-old received a financial penalty amounting to 10,000 euros (£7,700), with half of this sum deferred, contingent on him avoiding a similar infraction within the subsequent 12-month period. This sanction is less stringent compared to the one imposed on Red Bull’s Max Verstappen for an identical transgression at the Singapore Grand Prix in September; Verstappen was mandated to “accomplish some work of public interest”. Officials overseeing the Sao Paulo Grand Prix, who presided over Leclerc’s case, stated that a mitigating circumstance was that the Monegasque driver “was immediately apologetic”. Leclerc uttered expletives during the post-race press conference when prompted to describe his sensations after almost losing command of his vehicle in the final turn of the circuit, during an attempt to defend against McLaren’s Lando Norris. This occurrence, where Leclerc veered off the track and barely missed the barriers while struggling to regain control of his car, resulted in him forfeiting second position in the race to the British driver. The official decision stated that Leclerc had “used language in response to a somewhat leading question asking him, ‘what did you say to yourself’, in relation to the significant moment towards the end of the race when Leclerc was fighting to control the car at the exit of the last corner.” Subsequently, Leclerc employed offensive terminology, which was presented as an accurate reflection of his internal thoughts at that moment. Leclerc promptly recognized his mistake and offered an apology. The stewards’ choice to summon Leclerc regarding the infraction followed Verstappen’s highlighting of a perceived inconsistency between his own penalty in Singapore and Leclerc’s lack of accountability in Mexico. In Singapore, Verstappen conducted two acts of protest during official press conferences subsequent to his penalty, intentionally limiting his responses, only to later engage more comprehensively with journalists beyond the confines of the FIA press conference room. The events in Singapore occurred after FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem expressed in an interview with Autosport his desire for expletives not to be aired on television. The drivers reacted with displeasure to Ben Sulayem’s involvement, perceiving it as ill-advised, given that the radio communications broadcast on television portray their genuine personalities, with any offensive language being censored. F1, the commercial rights holder tasked with managing television broadcasts, has indicated no intention to alter its current methodology. George Russell, a Mercedes driver and director of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association, stated a fortnight ago that the drivers intended to release an open letter concerning the dispute. This correspondence, anticipated to reiterate the opinions already publicly articulated by the drivers while potentially introducing additional points not yet disclosed, has not been issued to date. Post navigation Is Manchester United Goalkeeper Andre Onana a Problem or a Solution for Amorim’s System? Bai Yulu Nears UK Championship Last-32 Stage