Cambridge City Council has revealed its plans concerning the future of the Guildhall, the Corn Exchange, and the market square. These proposals form a component of broader regeneration initiatives for the area designated as the “Civic Quarter.” Key elements of these plans involve converting the Guildhall’s upper floors into commercial office premises, equipping the Corn Exchange with solar panels and heat pumps, and establishing a covered section over the market square. The council’s strategy and resources scrutiny committee is scheduled to review these plans on Thursday, accompanied by a recommendation for the approval of both the designs and the associated budget. The Guildhall, currently home to the council’s chamber, is slated for a £41 million refurbishment. This renovation aims to transform portions of the structure into commercial offices, in addition to rendering the heritage building net zero and enhancing its accessibility. Furthermore, the ground floor is intended to be opened up to accommodate a public cafe. Additional proposals include a “cultural offering,” potentially entailing the relocation of the Museum of Cambridge to this site. According to the plans, the Corn Exchange is set for a £22 million refurbishment. This will include the installation of solar panels and a heat pump to boost its energy efficiency. To enhance accessibility at the venue, additional lifts are planned for installation. Parsons Court, situated adjacent to the Corn Exchange, is also scheduled for a renovation. Regarding the market square, proposals suggest covering half of the area with a canopy to house permanent stalls. The remaining half would be adaptable for temporary stalls or utilized for various events. Simon Smith, the executive councillor for finance and resources, stated that the council’s objective is to “secure the long-term viability of the Guildhall, the market square and the Corn Exchange.” He further explained that the financial commitment to the Guildhall would enable the authority to “reduce the council’s operating costs and generate commercial income to protect frontline services.” Post navigation Housing Development Proposal Rejected Despite Official Recommendation Detailed Plans Submitted for 125 Homes on March Field