A lawyer representing a dismissed presenter has leveled accusations of hypocrisy against BBC management. Nick Toms is representing Jack Murley at a tribunal taking place in Exeter, following Mr. Murley’s dismissal from BBC Radio Cornwall in 2024. Mr. Murley contends that his dismissal was discriminatory, citing his sexual orientation and his role as a union representative; however, the BBC refutes these claims, stating that he violated the corporation’s social media guidelines. Mr. Toms asserted that BBC managers operate under “one rule for management and another for union representatives” regarding social media conduct. Beginning in 2022, Mr. Murley utilized social media to voice his opinions concerning the BBC’s Local Value For All project. This initiative entailed modifications to BBC local radio operations and was supervised by Jason Horton, who informed the tribunal that they “had to allow some venting early on” because they aimed to enable individuals to express their sentiments about the proposed changes. Consequently, the BBC’s social media guidelines, which mandate “due impartiality” in staff posts, were not rigorously enforced during this period. Mr. Horton’s witness statement indicated that by Easter 2023, “people were going too far.” The BBC’s senior leadership team subsequently “agreed to a more robust approach” to guideline enforcement, and on June 26, 2023, an email was sent to all staff reiterating the BBC’s social media guidelines. Mr. Toms stated to Mr. Horton, “you decided this had to be cracked down on.” He further pointed out that BBC managers had openly discussed the project, offering their perspectives on the proposals. Mr. Toms commented, “Due impartiality allows management to publicly air their side of the argument but union members can’t air their views on the same points on that discussion.” He alleged that Mr. Horton was “going after” Mr. Murley and “using due impartiality to supress” his views. Mr. Horton responded, “To suggest we went after him is a nonsense.” He explained that when managers discussed the changes on air, opposing viewpoints were presented to ensure due impartiality. He added: “I can’t think of another media organisation where that would happen.” Mr. Horton stated: “Our guidelines are very clear about how to engage on social media and Jack didn’t follow them.” Judge Alastair Smail inquired of Mr. Horton whether National Union of Journalists (NUJ) representatives who also serve as reporters are consistently bound by these guidelines. Mr. Horton replied: “I think the impartiality for presenters and reporters trumps the union representative role.” Tim Burke, whose responsibilities include upholding editorial standards throughout BBC England and ensuring adherence to policies and guidelines, also provided testimony. He testified: “Jack consistently pinged on my radar from 2019 onwards,” due to violations of social media guidelines. He clarified during the tribunal that BBC staff members were expected to report on the Local Value For All proposals with the same journalistic standards applied to any other subject. He asserted, “Social media is essentially broadcasting.” He added, “Your social media conduct, as a representative of the BBC needs to represent your impartial positions.” The tribunal proceedings are ongoing. For updates from BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight, platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram are available. This material is copyrighted by the BBC in 2024, with all rights reserved. The BBC bears no responsibility for the content hosted on external websites. Information regarding our policy on linking to external sites can be accessed. Post navigation Influencer “Gutted” After Instagram Account With 14,500 Followers Is Disabled Without Explanation Audience Feedback Requested Following Newcastle’s 3-1 Win Against Brentford