Accountability and Power Dynamics in Football Management

The theme of political power struggles is a common narrative across various forms of media. Examples range from classic plays like Hamlet, King Lear, and MacBeth, to historical dramas such as Wolf Hall, and modern television series including Succession and Game of Thrones, which vividly depict these age-old conflicts. Currently, the focus is on football, where a persistent conflict between first-team coaches and acquisitions/football directors is evident. These internal disputes are often kept confidential, leading to speculation about situations such as that involving Edu and Arsenal. Despite the varied titles assigned to these roles, a significant power struggle exists to gain influence with the ultimate owner and controller. While past events at Chelsea were intense, the current drama attracting attention is at West Ham. At West Ham, David Moyes reportedly lost a power contest to Tim Steidten, who holds the title of technical director. However, with Julen Lopetegui currently facing difficulties, scrutiny is shifting from the dugout towards the main stand and Steidten. Questions are being raised regarding the acquisition of the 10 new players over the summer, who have collectively scored a modest three goals. In Moyes’ ‘unacceptable’ final season, West Ham achieved 1.4 points per game. This season, the team currently stands at 1.1 points per game. Although it is still early, this difference could mark a shift from a comfortable mid-table position to hovering near the relegation zone. Consequently, technical advisors are now experiencing the accountability that accompanies wielding power.