Demolition Plans for Cambridge Art Deco Cinema Rejected

A proposal to demolish an art deco cinema situated within a city’s conservation area has been turned down. The Central Cinema, located on Hobson Street in Cambridge, commenced operations in 1921, subsequently functioned as a bingo hall, and ceased activity in 2009. Councillors rejected the plans on Wednesday, which sought to raze the structure to facilitate the construction of retail units, office spaces, and a community area. Prior to the decision, planning officers from Cambridge City Council had characterized the edifice as “iconic and rare,” indicating that the proposed development might inflict “heritage harm” if implemented. Although not a listed building, the disused, boarded-up cinema holds a designation as a structure of local interest. An application submitted in April proposed its demolition, along with other buildings on Sidney Street, while retaining their existing facades. The building exhibits a 1930s Egyptian art deco architectural style, distinguished by a bright white facade. Mark Richer, the owner of the former cinema since 2011, stated that his proposed project would have enhanced Hobsons Passage, which is situated next to the property. Addressing the council’s planning committee, Mr. Richer asserted: “The new building being proposed is amazing.” He further detailed that the development would incorporate solar panels, facilitate rainwater reuse, contribute £43 million annually to the city’s economy, and offer rent-free community facilities. He added: “And a massive clean-up of Hobsons Passage which is currently Cambridge’s largest open-air toilet and litter bin.” Council officers, in their official report, noted that the building possessed “iconic and rare architectural features” and deemed its loss “unacceptable.” Additionally, they criticized the proposed roof extension, describing it as “bulky and inappropriate.” However, they commended Mr. Richer’s efforts to include community space in the plans. During the meeting, councillors expressed varied opinions regarding the proposals. Katie Porrer, the Liberal Democrat spokesperson for planning at the city council, commented: “I personally do not object to this being redeveloped [but] the problems with this outweigh the benefits at the moment.” She further stated: “That frontage is iconic.”