East Renfrewshire Council Postpones Decision on Social Care Charges

East Renfrewshire Council has postponed its decision regarding the implementation of charges for non-residential care services until February. The council’s initial intention was to introduce fees for specific care components, including social support and day trips. However, advocates have labeled the proposed £20 per hour fees as “unfair” and “immoral.” These campaigners expressed concerns that the charges might result in social isolation for individuals dependent on such support. The council had previously stated its expectation that these charges would generate £1.5m, contributing to addressing a £12m deficit within East Renfrewshire’s health and social care partnership (HSCP) budget. It has been clarified that personal care and services provided to children would not be impacted by these charges. Categories of non-residential care encompass social supports, fees for meals, day opportunities, and community-based services. Tracey Campbell, mother of 18-year-old Leia, who requires 24-hour support, conveyed her apprehension regarding the potential effects of these charges to the BBC earlier this week. Ms. Campbell stated that Leia utilizes a self-directed support budget, which is “mainly spent on support workers to keep her safe.” Ms. Campbell explained that her daughter, diagnosed with Angelman syndrome, depends on outings and activities like horse riding to prevent social isolation and maintain her sense of safety and well-being. Leia’s medical condition results in severe physical and learning disabilities. Ms. Campbell expressed concern that the proposed new charge could prevent her daughter from affording the necessary support to continue her hobbies while also maintaining financial independence. A petition initiated by the Netherlee mother, urging health officials in East Renfrewshire to abandon the suggested charges, garnered support from nearly 1,000 individuals. The petition asserted: “For my daughter, going to the cinema, shows, and pantomime is not a pastime. It’s a lifeline in her battle against social isolation.” It further stated: “This proposal would potentially strip away 60% of affected individual’s disposable income, making it almost impossible for them to participate in much-needed social activities.” Following discussions, members of the council’s cabinet reached an agreement to postpone the decision until the ramifications of Wednesday’s Scottish government budget become apparent. Council leader Owen O’Donnell commented: “This is a proposal that has implications for some of our most vulnerable residents, so we need to ensure that we give it the time and care it deserves. “While we don’t want to give people false hope, it’s only right we pause and have all the facts available before we make this difficult decision.” The council indicated that it had refrained from proposing these charges for an extended period and highlighted its status as the sole HSCP in Greater Glasgow and Clyde that did not impose fees for non-residential care. The proposal is scheduled for reconsideration at the subsequent Cabinet meeting, set for 6 February 2025.