Proposed changes to the local government system could be “hugely disruptive”, Hampshire’s council leader has cautioned. The government has previously announced its intentions to decrease the total number of councils and grant additional powers to mayors. These reforms were described by the government as a “turning point” for the provision of local infrastructure and services. Nick Adams-King, the Conservative leader of Hampshire County Council, acknowledged that devolution could benefit planning and public transport, but expressed “despair” regarding the proposed restructuring of local government. During the announcement of these proposals, deputy prime minister Angela Rayner characterized the UK as the “most centralised” country in Europe and committed to ceasing “micromanaging by central government”. These proposals, aimed at streamlining local authorities, could lead to the dissolution of borough and district councils in areas such as East Hampshire, Eastleigh, and Test Valley. Consolidated areas would feature an elected metro mayor responsible for allocating government funds for initiatives like transport and infrastructure. Across much of Hampshire, the county council manages schools, waste disposal sites, and social care, whereas district councils oversee parks, leisure facilities, and refuse collection. Southampton and Portsmouth operate as unitary city councils, delivering a comprehensive array of council services. Philip Munday, the Labour leader of Havant Borough Council, stated that the plans were “not unreasonable”, especially if additional resources were supplied by the government. “There would be advantages in some cases … like the collection of rubbish from your house which is done by Havant, but where that rubbish goes and how it is processed is done by Hampshire, which I can see could cause a waste of resources.” “However, I am worried that our government is quite local so it will be important when we talk about this to make sure that we get the best deal for Havant.” Jill Cleary, the Conservative leader of New Forest District Council, indicated that the authority was assessing the ramifications of the proposals, further stating: “My commitment remains to ensure the New Forest has a strong voice in the discussions to come.” Mr Adams-King commented: “That idea of giving strategic powers to a mayor – enabling us to do planning better, to do public transport better, to do health better – that is a good idea.” “The idea of trying to reorganise councils at the same time is the bit that leaves me in a bit of despair – that’s hugely disruptive. ” “We risk losing any of the benefits that the government are talking about in terms of saving money with the disruption and the uncertainty.” Post navigation Treasury Minister Details £18m Cost for Ben-my-Chree Modernization MP Calls New Bradford Parking Charges an ‘Insult’ to Residents